Comments on: Barca could sign Cesc and Robinho next year

By: Magaji ynkb

Magaji ynkb — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:16:42 +0000

Mesi is d best player in d world!

By: MARLON

MARLON — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:50:35 +0000

we dont need none of those players. barca is a young team still, the only one who is getting a little old is henry but barca has pedro to replace him so we’re good for at least 2 or 3 years. puyol is also getting a little old but hes a beast, he’ll last for a couple of years.

BARCA ALL DAY!!! LETS WIN THE FIFA CLUB WORLD CUP!!!!

By: d0n mayor

d0n mayor — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:04:58 +0000

plz if we can get somebody like pablo from valacia then i think that will be very ok. i do like his movement in the pitch.

By: d0n mayor

d0n mayor — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:04:58 +0000

plz if we can get somebody like pablo from valacia then i think that will be very ok. i do like his movement in the pitch.

By: Kenny

Kenny — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:14:57 +0000

Though,both players are gud option 4 barcelona.But pedro,bojan&do santos were ready to play.It all depends on barcelona style of play.

By: carlton

carlton — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:31:06 +0000

Robhino is like ronaldhino now enough said….

By: igor

igor — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:42:32 +0000

ja se nadam da ce robinho i fabregas foci jer ce to onda biti prava pojacanja e ne kao Chingrinski i Maxvel koji ne ne igraju u 1. timu ali i oni su dobri za pocetak

BRCA 4 EVER

By: Minho

Minho — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:59:36 +0000

Let’s consider the current formation that Pep uses and the current squad… If Cesc joins Barcelona, he would likely compete with Xavi and Iniesta for the one of the two attacking midfield positions, the containing midfield position is filled by another type of player. How likely is it for Iniesta to be pushed up to take Henry’s position on the left wing? Personally I think it could be done but would he be as effective as a natural left wing? If a natural left wing is a better choice, why Robinho for the obvious reasons that all of you mentioned? I would rather go with Mata or Silva , who are at a much better price. From a transactional point of view, the option of surrendering Tourre (who is considering the transfer and Busquets is ready to take his place) and Puyol (I hope they don’t do this, I love Puyol) plus money for Robinho would sound good to Hughes. On another hand, the option of surrendering Henry and Puyol plus money for Cesc would sound good to Wenger. I believe that the key would be in the amount of extra money asked by the counterparty. Lastly, is Puyol being part of the transaction absolutly necessary? Despite his age, his versatility on the back end is of extreem value is it not? Furthermore, Marquez is only one year younger than him and Milito is only 2 years younger than him. Even if Pep doesn’t think that he should be in the starting 11, he could rotate with Pique, Chygrynskiy and Alves when they are rested unless another defender is scheduled to transfer to Barcelona.

By: Karo

Karo — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:42:52 +0000

I’m sure we wont sign Robinho because by the time the summer comes Pedro will have proven that he is ready to take Henry’s role. Bojan will have improved as well. As far as Cesc, If we’re lokking to buy him as a replacement for Xavi then let me tell you Xavi will still be around for another 2-3 years so Cesc will have to get used to starting on the bench more often if he wants to wear the blaugrana. I believe Jonathan Dos Santos is the future of our midfield along with Iniesta.

By: Yemmy

Yemmy — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:01:08 +0000

In my own view i think we don’t need those player rather we need good defender like chivu.for now we have d best attacking and midfielder in d whole world.